netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] sctp: fix identification of new acks for SFR-CACC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180425181039.GY4716@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:10:40 -0300
From:   Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
        lucien.xin@...il.com, vyasevich@...il.com, nhorman@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sctp: fix identification of new acks for
 SFR-CACC

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 01:22:39PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 18:17:35 -0300
>
> > It's currently written as:
> >
> > if (!tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) {   [1]
> > 	tchunk->tsn_gap_acked = 1;
> > 	...
> > }
> >
> > if (TSN_lte(tsn, sack_ctsn)) {
> > 	if (!tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) {
> > 		/* SFR-CACC processing */
> > 		...
> > 	}
> > }
> >
> > Which causes the SFR-CACC processing on ack reception to never process,
> > as tchunk->tsn_gap_acked is always true by then. Block [1] was
> > moved to that position by the commit marked below.
> >
> > This patch fixes it by doing SFR-CACC processing earlier, before
> > tsn_gap_acked is set to true.
> >
> > Fixes: 31b02e154940 ("sctp: Failover transmitted list on transport delete")
> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Even though this is a -stable candidate, please apply it to net-next
> > to avoid conflicts with subsequent patches in my queue. Thanks.
>
> Applied.
>
> However, if you do want this to make it's way to -stable you'll have to get
> it integrated into 'net' first.

Ok. Will send an email by then.

  Marcelo