lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 2 May 2018 22:04:01 +0300
From:   Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Thomas.Winter@...iedtelesis.co.nz, davem@...emloft.net,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com,
        pch@...bogen.com, jkbs@...hat.com, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
        mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] ipv6: Calculate hash thresholds for IPv6
 nexthops

On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 12:58:56PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 5/2/18 12:53 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > 
> > So this fixes the issue for me. To reproduce:
> > 
> > # ip -6 address add 2001:db8::1/64 dev dummy0
> > # ip -6 address add 2001:db8::1/64 dev dummy1
> > 
> > This reproduces the issue because due to above commit both local routes
> > are considered siblings... :/
> > 
> > local 2001:db8::1 proto kernel metric 0 
> >         nexthop dev dummy0 weight 1 
> >         nexthop dev dummy1 weight 1 pref medium
> > 
> > I think it's best to revert the patch and have Thomas submit a fixed
> > version to net-next. I was actually surprised to see it applied to net.
> 
> ugly side effect of the way ecmp routes are managed in IPv6. I think
> revert is the best option for now.

OK. I'll send a patch.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ