[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180509071858.11124-1-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 00:18:58 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: oss-drivers@...ronome.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Pieter Jansen van Vuuren
<pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] nfp: flower: remove headroom from max MTU calculation
From: Pieter Jansen van Vuuren <pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com>
Since commit 29a5dcae2790 ("nfp: flower: offload phys port MTU change") we
take encapsulation headroom into account when calculating the max allowed
MTU. This is unnecessary as the max MTU advertised by firmware should have
already accounted for encap headroom.
Subtracting headroom twice brings the max MTU below what's necessary for
some deployments.
Fixes: 29a5dcae2790 ("nfp: flower: offload phys port MTU change")
Signed-off-by: Pieter Jansen van Vuuren <pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com>
Reviewed-by: John Hurley <john.hurley@...ronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
---
.../net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/main.c | 19 -------------------
1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/main.c
index a997e34bcec2..84e3b9f5abb1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/main.c
@@ -52,8 +52,6 @@
#define NFP_FLOWER_ALLOWED_VER 0x0001000000010000UL
-#define NFP_FLOWER_FRAME_HEADROOM 158
-
static const char *nfp_flower_extra_cap(struct nfp_app *app, struct nfp_net *nn)
{
return "FLOWER";
@@ -559,22 +557,6 @@ static void nfp_flower_clean(struct nfp_app *app)
app->priv = NULL;
}
-static int
-nfp_flower_check_mtu(struct nfp_app *app, struct net_device *netdev,
- int new_mtu)
-{
- /* The flower fw reserves NFP_FLOWER_FRAME_HEADROOM bytes of the
- * supported max MTU to allow for appending tunnel headers. To prevent
- * unexpected behaviour this needs to be accounted for.
- */
- if (new_mtu > netdev->max_mtu - NFP_FLOWER_FRAME_HEADROOM) {
- nfp_err(app->cpp, "New MTU (%d) is not valid\n", new_mtu);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static bool nfp_flower_check_ack(struct nfp_flower_priv *app_priv)
{
bool ret;
@@ -656,7 +638,6 @@ const struct nfp_app_type app_flower = {
.init = nfp_flower_init,
.clean = nfp_flower_clean,
- .check_mtu = nfp_flower_check_mtu,
.repr_change_mtu = nfp_flower_repr_change_mtu,
.vnic_alloc = nfp_flower_vnic_alloc,
--
2.17.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists