[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <460e5002-b5a2-c78b-8727-6692180707f1@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 09:31:10 +0200
From: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@....samsung.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: s.schmidt@...sung.com, linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org,
alex.aring@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull-request: ieee802154 2018-05-08
Hello.
On 05/09/2018 02:06 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@....samsung.com>
> Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 21:55:37 +0200
>
>> On 05/08/2018 04:18 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>> Please submit the -stable fix directly, you can feel free to CC: me.
>> Will do when the patch hits Linus git tree.
>>
>> I have a quick question on the process here. From the netdev-faq document
>> I was under the impression all stable patches under net/ and drivers/net
>> should be brought up to you and would be handled by you.
>>
>> Does this apply to the core part of net (I fully understand that ieee802154
>> is rather a niche) or is there some other reason for this exception?
>>
>> Both processes (the normal stable one as well as the slightly different one
>> for net/) would be fine to go with for me. Just need to know which one I
>> should use for future stable patches. :-)
>>
>> regards
>> Stefan Schmidt
> Generally wireless and ipsec have been submitting them directly,
> sometimes the Intel ethernet guys do too.
>
> Sometimes this makes things easier for me, and I'll ask you to submit
> things directly when that is the case like right now.
Thanks for taking the time to explain it. I will go ahead and handle
the stable patches for ieee802154 directly from now on. If you want
to have this changed again just let me know.
regards
Stefan Schmidt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists