[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <152657877097.9825.6742536221308880897.stgit@firesoul>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 19:39:31 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@...earbox.net>, joe@...d.net.nz,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: check return value of fopen in
test_verifier.c
Commit 0a6748740368 ("selftests/bpf: Only run tests if !bpf_disabled")
forgot to check return value of fopen.
This caused some confusion, when running test_verifier (from
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/) on an older kernel (< v4.4) as it will
simply seqfault.
This fix avoids the segfault and prints an error, but allow program to
continue. Given the sysctl was introduced in 1be7f75d1668 ("bpf:
enable non-root eBPF programs"), we know that the running kernel
cannot support unpriv, thus continue with unpriv_disabled = true.
Fixes: 0a6748740368 ("selftests/bpf: Only run tests if !bpf_disabled")
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index a877af00605d..94498eaf872e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -12337,6 +12337,11 @@ static void get_unpriv_disabled()
FILE *fd;
fd = fopen("/proc/sys/"UNPRIV_SYSCTL, "r");
+ if (!fd) {
+ perror("fopen /proc/sys/"UNPRIV_SYSCTL);
+ unpriv_disabled = true;
+ return;
+ }
if (fgets(buf, 2, fd) == buf && atoi(buf))
unpriv_disabled = true;
fclose(fd);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists