netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 00/12] net: stmmac: Clean-up and tune-up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180517.144117.1704300189822624802.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 17 May 2018 14:41:17 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com
Cc:     f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com, Vitor.Soares@...opsys.com,
        peppe.cavallaro@...com, alexandre.torgue@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 00/12] net: stmmac: Clean-up and tune-up

From: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 14:24:42 +0100

> Given that the difference between better/worst is < 1%, I think
> we can conclude patches 3-13 don't affect the overall
> performance. I didn't profile the cache hits/miss though ...

Ok, thanks for making an effort to look into this more thoroughly.

I'll apply this series to net-next, thank you.