| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 18:38:36 -0300
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Cc: jiri@...nulli.us, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jhs@...atatu.com,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, kliteyn@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] net: sched: implement reference counted action
release
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 12:17:25AM +0300, Vlad Buslov wrote:
> Implement helper delete function that uses new action ops 'delete', instead
> of destroying action directly. This is required so act API could delete
> actions by index, without holding any references to action that is being
> deleted.
>
> Implement function __tcf_action_put() that releases reference to action and
> frees it, if necessary. Refactor action deletion code to use new put
> function and not to rely on rtnl lock. Remove rtnl lock assertions that are
> no longer needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes from V1 to V2:
> - Removed redundant actions ops lookup during delete.
> - Assume all actions have delete implemented and don't check for it
> explicitly.
> - Rearrange variable definitions in tcf_action_delete.
>
> net/sched/act_api.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> net/sched/cls_api.c | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/act_api.c b/net/sched/act_api.c
> index 0f31f09946ab..a023873db713 100644
> --- a/net/sched/act_api.c
> +++ b/net/sched/act_api.c
> @@ -90,21 +90,39 @@ static void free_tcf(struct tc_action *p)
> kfree(p);
> }
>
> -static void tcf_idr_remove(struct tcf_idrinfo *idrinfo, struct tc_action *p)
> +static void tcf_action_cleanup(struct tc_action *p)
> {
> - spin_lock(&idrinfo->lock);
> - idr_remove(&idrinfo->action_idr, p->tcfa_index);
> - spin_unlock(&idrinfo->lock);
> + if (p->ops->cleanup)
> + p->ops->cleanup(p);
> +
> gen_kill_estimator(&p->tcfa_rate_est);
> free_tcf(p);
> }
>
> +static int __tcf_action_put(struct tc_action *p, bool bind)
> +{
> + struct tcf_idrinfo *idrinfo = p->idrinfo;
> +
> + if (refcount_dec_and_lock(&p->tcfa_refcnt, &idrinfo->lock)) {
> + if (bind)
> + atomic_dec(&p->tcfa_bindcnt);
> + idr_remove(&idrinfo->action_idr, p->tcfa_index);
> + spin_unlock(&idrinfo->lock);
> +
> + tcf_action_cleanup(p);
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + if (bind)
> + atomic_dec(&p->tcfa_bindcnt);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int __tcf_idr_release(struct tc_action *p, bool bind, bool strict)
> {
> int ret = 0;
>
> - ASSERT_RTNL();
> -
> /* Release with strict==1 and bind==0 is only called through act API
> * interface (classifiers always bind). Only case when action with
> * positive reference count and zero bind count can exist is when it was
> @@ -118,18 +136,11 @@ int __tcf_idr_release(struct tc_action *p, bool bind, bool strict)
> * are acceptable.
> */
> if (p) {
> - if (bind)
> - atomic_dec(&p->tcfa_bindcnt);
> - else if (strict && atomic_read(&p->tcfa_bindcnt) > 0)
> + if (!bind && strict && atomic_read(&p->tcfa_bindcnt) > 0)
> return -EPERM;
>
> - if (atomic_read(&p->tcfa_bindcnt) <= 0 &&
> - refcount_dec_and_test(&p->tcfa_refcnt)) {
> - if (p->ops->cleanup)
> - p->ops->cleanup(p);
> - tcf_idr_remove(p->idrinfo, p);
> + if (__tcf_action_put(p, bind))
> ret = ACT_P_DELETED;
> - }
> }
>
> return ret;
> @@ -340,11 +351,7 @@ int tcf_idr_delete_index(struct tc_action_net *tn, u32 index)
> p->tcfa_index));
> spin_unlock(&idrinfo->lock);
>
> - if (p->ops->cleanup)
> - p->ops->cleanup(p);
> -
> - gen_kill_estimator(&p->tcfa_rate_est);
> - free_tcf(p);
> + tcf_action_cleanup(p);
> module_put(owner);
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -615,6 +622,11 @@ int tcf_action_destroy(struct list_head *actions, int bind)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int tcf_action_put(struct tc_action *p)
> +{
> + return __tcf_action_put(p, false);
> +}
> +
> int
> tcf_action_dump_old(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tc_action *a, int bind, int ref)
> {
> @@ -1092,6 +1104,35 @@ static int tca_action_flush(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int tcf_action_delete(struct net *net, struct list_head *actions,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> + struct tc_action *a, *tmp;
> + u32 act_index;
> + int ret;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(a, tmp, actions, list) {
> + const struct tc_action_ops *ops = a->ops;
> +
> + /* Actions can be deleted concurrently so we must save their
> + * type and id to search again after reference is released.
> + */
> + act_index = a->tcfa_index;
> +
> + list_del(&a->list);
> + if (tcf_action_put(a)) {
> + /* last reference, action was deleted concurrently */
> + module_put(ops->owner);
> + } else {
> + /* now do the delete */
> + ret = ops->delete(net, act_index);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int
> tcf_del_notify(struct net *net, struct nlmsghdr *n, struct list_head *actions,
> u32 portid, size_t attr_size, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> @@ -1112,7 +1153,7 @@ tcf_del_notify(struct net *net, struct nlmsghdr *n, struct list_head *actions,
> }
>
> /* now do the delete */
> - ret = tcf_action_destroy(actions, 0);
> + ret = tcf_action_delete(net, actions, extack);
> if (ret < 0) {
> NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Failed to delete TC action");
> kfree_skb(skb);
> @@ -1164,7 +1205,6 @@ tca_action_gd(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla, struct nlmsghdr *n,
> if (event == RTM_GETACTION)
> ret = tcf_get_notify(net, portid, n, &actions, event, extack);
> else { /* delete */
> - cleanup_a(&actions, 1); /* lookup took reference */
> ret = tcf_del_notify(net, n, &actions, portid, attr_size, extack);
> if (ret)
> goto err;
> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
> index efbf01ce14c2..dd37d0ae3fce 100644
> --- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
> +++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
> @@ -1417,7 +1417,6 @@ void tcf_exts_destroy(struct tcf_exts *exts)
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> LIST_HEAD(actions);
>
> - ASSERT_RTNL();
> tcf_exts_to_list(exts, &actions);
> tcf_action_destroy(&actions, TCA_ACT_UNBIND);
> kfree(exts->actions);
> --
> 2.7.5
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists