[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <wihk1rngarv.fsf@dev-r-vrt-156.mtr.labs.mlnx>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 16:39:00 +0300
From: Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>, <bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
<jiri@...lanox.com>, <idosch@...lanox.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<razvan.stefanescu@....com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<stephen@...workplumber.org>, <andrew@...n.ch>,
<vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>, <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
<nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/7] net: bridge: Extract boilerplate around switchdev_port_obj_*()
Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com> writes:
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> index 11520ed..33bd914 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> @@ -1178,6 +1178,9 @@ static inline void br_switchdev_frame_unmark(struct sk_buff *skb)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_NET_SWITCHDEV */
>
> +int br_switchdev_port_vlan_add(struct net_device *dev, u16 vid, u16 flags);
> +int br_switchdev_port_vlan_del(struct net_device *dev, u16 vid);
> +
Nope, this actually does need to be in the ifdef block. The whole
br_switchdev.c is built conditionally.
I'll send v3.
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists