netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/7] rocker: rocker

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180529102543.GA1883@apalos>
Date:   Tue, 29 May 2018 13:25:43 +0300
From:   Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
To:     Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, jiri@...lanox.com,
        idosch@...lanox.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        razvan.stefanescu@....com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        stephen@...workplumber.org, andrew@...n.ch,
        vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/7] rocker: rocker_main: Ignore bridge VLAN
 events

Hi Petr, 

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 12:50:09PM +0200, Petr Machata wrote:
> Ignore VLAN events where the orig_dev is the bridge device itself.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c
> index e73e4fe..aeafdb9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c
> @@ -1632,6 +1632,9 @@ rocker_world_port_obj_vlan_add(struct rocker_port *rocker_port,
>  {
>  	struct rocker_world_ops *wops = rocker_port->rocker->wops;
>  
> +	if (netif_is_bridge_master(vlan->obj.orig_dev))
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
What will happen to the "bridge vlan add dev br0 vid X pvid untagged self" when
the lower level (the driver) returns -EOPNOTSUPP? Will it avoid adding a vlan on
the bridge ?

>  	if (!wops->port_obj_vlan_add)
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  
> @@ -1647,6 +1650,9 @@ rocker_world_port_obj_vlan_del(struct rocker_port *rocker_port,
>  {
>  	struct rocker_world_ops *wops = rocker_port->rocker->wops;
>  
> +	if (netif_is_bridge_master(vlan->obj.orig_dev))
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
>  	if (!wops->port_obj_vlan_del)
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  	return wops->port_obj_vlan_del(rocker_port, vlan);
> -- 
> 2.4.11
>