[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180529191628.3f6aa7dd@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 19:16:28 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: brouer@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 03/11] bpf: fixup error message from gpl
helpers on license mismatch
On Mon, 28 May 2018 02:43:36 +0200
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
> Stating 'proprietary program' in the error is just silly since it
> can also be a different open source license than that which is just
> not compatible.
>
> Reference: https://twitter.com/majek04/status/998531268039102465
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Thank you for cleaning up this confusion :-)
> ---
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 1fd9667b..4f4786e 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -2462,7 +2462,7 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn
>
> /* eBPF programs must be GPL compatible to use GPL-ed functions */
> if (!env->prog->gpl_compatible && fn->gpl_only) {
> - verbose(env, "cannot call GPL only function from proprietary program\n");
> + verbose(env, "cannot call GPL-restricted function from non-GPL compatible program\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists