[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW4v=V0mbz07xe_shd68WP3BoV8iofxyVGApi+sL9kgzWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 10:17:34 -0700
From: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@...il.com>
To: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>, Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
"Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: fix alignment of netns_dev/netns_ino fields
in bpf_{map,prog}_info
On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 4:28 AM, Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com> wrote:
> Recent introduction of netns_dev/netns_ino to bpf_map_info/bpf_prog info
> has broken compat, as offsets of these fields are different in 32-bit
> and 64-bit ABIs. One fix (other than implementing compat support in
> syscall in order to handle this discrepancy) is to use __aligned_u64
> instead of __u64 for these fields.
>
> Reported-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@...linux.org>
> Fixes: 52775b33bb507 ("bpf: offload: report device information about
> offloaded maps")
> Fixes: 675fc275a3a2d ("bpf: offload: report device information for
> offloaded programs")
>
> Signed-off-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 8 ++++----
> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 8 ++++----
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index c5ec897..903010a 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -1017,8 +1017,8 @@ struct bpf_prog_info {
> __aligned_u64 map_ids;
> char name[BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN];
> __u32 ifindex;
> - __u64 netns_dev;
> - __u64 netns_ino;
> + __aligned_u64 netns_dev;
> + __aligned_u64 netns_ino;
> } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
Shall we add a __u32 padding variable before netns_dev? We can use it
for in the future.
Thanks,
Song
>
> struct bpf_map_info {
> @@ -1030,8 +1030,8 @@ struct bpf_map_info {
> __u32 map_flags;
> char name[BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN];
> __u32 ifindex;
> - __u64 netns_dev;
> - __u64 netns_ino;
> + __aligned_u64 netns_dev;
> + __aligned_u64 netns_ino;
> } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
>
> /* User bpf_sock_addr struct to access socket fields and sockaddr struct passed
> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index c5ec897..903010a 100644
> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -1017,8 +1017,8 @@ struct bpf_prog_info {
> __aligned_u64 map_ids;
> char name[BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN];
> __u32 ifindex;
> - __u64 netns_dev;
> - __u64 netns_ino;
> + __aligned_u64 netns_dev;
> + __aligned_u64 netns_ino;
> } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
>
> struct bpf_map_info {
> @@ -1030,8 +1030,8 @@ struct bpf_map_info {
> __u32 map_flags;
> char name[BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN];
> __u32 ifindex;
> - __u64 netns_dev;
> - __u64 netns_ino;
> + __aligned_u64 netns_dev;
> + __aligned_u64 netns_ino;
> } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
>
> /* User bpf_sock_addr struct to access socket fields and sockaddr struct passed
> --
> 2.1.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists