[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04210bba-f67a-dd10-cdce-c7d140dcecbe@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 12:34:18 -0700
From: "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] failover: eliminate callback hell
On 6/11/2018 11:10 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 08:42:31PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> * Set permanent and current address of net_failover device
>> to match the primary.
>>
>> * Carrier should be marked off before registering device
>> the net_failover device.
> Sridhar, do we want to address this?
> If yes, could you please take a look at addressing these
> meanwhile, while we keep arguing about making API changes?
Sure. I will submit patches to address these issues raised by Stephen.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists