[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2ffcd7c4-17bf-2e7b-fd48-d61b2a6f2ade@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 17:08:29 -0700
From: "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] failover: eliminate callback hell
On 6/11/2018 12:34 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
>
> On 6/11/2018 11:10 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 08:42:31PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> * Set permanent and current address of net_failover device
>>> to match the primary.
We copy the dev_addr of standby dev to failover_dev in net_failover_create()
before calling register_netdev().
register_netdev() does a copy of dev_addr to perm_addr.
So i don't think this is an issue.
>>>
>>> * Carrier should be marked off before registering device
>>> the net_failover device.
Will fix this and also a couple of places dev_err() needs to be replaced with netdev_err()
>> Sridhar, do we want to address this?
>> If yes, could you please take a look at addressing these
>> meanwhile, while we keep arguing about making API changes?
>
> Sure. I will submit patches to address these issues raised by Stephen.
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists