[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b9c88515-cf41-2a9a-078e-9c9e5adbbf14@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:08:45 -0700
From: "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com,
virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
jiri@...nulli.us, kubakici@...pl, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, loseweigh@...il.com,
aaron.f.brown@...el.com
Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Introduce
VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net
On 6/12/2018 4:34 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 10:02:45PM -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
>> On 6/11/2018 7:17 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 09:54:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>> On 2018年06月12日 01:26, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:09:54PM -0700, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
>>>>>> This feature bit can be used by hypervisor to indicate virtio_net device to
>>>>>> act as a standby for another device with the same MAC address.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I tested this with a small change to the patch to mark the STANDBY feature 'true'
>>>>>> by default as i am using libvirt to start the VMs.
>>>>>> Is there a way to pass the newly added feature bit 'standby' to qemu via libvirt
>>>>>> XML file?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
>>>>> So I do not think we can commit to this interface: we
>>>>> really need to control visibility of the primary device.
>>>> The problem is legacy guest won't use primary device at all if we do this.
>>> And that's by design - I think it's the only way to ensure the
>>> legacy guest isn't confused.
>> Yes. I think so. But i am not sure if Qemu is the right place to control the visibility
>> of the primary device. The primary device may not be specified as an argument to Qemu. It
>> may be plugged in later.
>> The cloud service provider is providing a feature that enables low latency datapath and live
>> migration capability.
>> A tenant can use this feature only if he is running a VM that has virtio-net with failover support.
> Well live migration is there already. The new feature is low latency
> data path.
we get live migration with just virtio. But I meant live migration with VF as
primary device.
>
> And it's the guest that needs failover support not the VM.
Isn't guest and VM synonymous?
>
>
>> I think Qemu should check if guest virtio-net supports this feature and provide a mechanism for
>> an upper layer indicating if the STANDBY feature is successfully negotiated or not.
>> The upper layer can then decide if it should hot plug a VF with the same MAC and manage the 2 links.
>> If VF is successfully hot plugged, virtio-net link should be disabled.
> Did you even talk to upper layer management about it?
> Just list the steps they need to do and you will see
> that's a lot of machinery to manage by the upper layer.
>
> What do we gain in flexibility? As far as I can see the
> only gain is some resources saved for legacy VMs.
>
> That's not a lot as tenant of the upper layer probably already has
> at least a hunch that it's a new guest otherwise
> why bother specifying the feature at all - you
> save even more resources without it.
>
I am not all that familiar with how Qemu manages network devices. If we can do all the
required management of the primary/standby devices within Qemu, that is definitely a better
approach without upper layer involvement.
>
>
>>>> How about control the visibility of standby device?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>> standy the always there to guarantee no downtime.
>>>
>>>>> However just for testing purposes, we could add a non-stable
>>>>> interface "x-standby" with the understanding that as any
>>>>> x- prefix it's unstable and will be changed down the road,
>>>>> likely in the next release.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> hw/net/virtio-net.c | 2 ++
>>>>>> include/standard-headers/linux/virtio_net.h | 3 +++
>>>>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/hw/net/virtio-net.c b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
>>>>>> index 90502fca7c..38b3140670 100644
>>>>>> --- a/hw/net/virtio-net.c
>>>>>> +++ b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
>>>>>> @@ -2198,6 +2198,8 @@ static Property virtio_net_properties[] = {
>>>>>> true),
>>>>>> DEFINE_PROP_INT32("speed", VirtIONet, net_conf.speed, SPEED_UNKNOWN),
>>>>>> DEFINE_PROP_STRING("duplex", VirtIONet, net_conf.duplex_str),
>>>>>> + DEFINE_PROP_BIT64("standby", VirtIONet, host_features, VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY,
>>>>>> + false),
>>>>>> DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/standard-headers/linux/virtio_net.h b/include/standard-headers/linux/virtio_net.h
>>>>>> index e9f255ea3f..01ec09684c 100644
>>>>>> --- a/include/standard-headers/linux/virtio_net.h
>>>>>> +++ b/include/standard-headers/linux/virtio_net.h
>>>>>> @@ -57,6 +57,9 @@
>>>>>> * Steering */
>>>>>> #define VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_MAC_ADDR 23 /* Set MAC address */
>>>>>> +#define VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY 62 /* Act as standby for another device
>>>>>> + * with the same MAC.
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> #define VIRTIO_NET_F_SPEED_DUPLEX 63 /* Device set linkspeed and duplex */
>>>>>> #ifndef VIRTIO_NET_NO_LEGACY
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.14.3
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@...ts.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@...ts.oasis-open.org
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists