lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpV=3wmEBm2OjJ9HSvP=XE_CEs7einMKO3sgTEwvt+8wag@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jun 2018 15:56:27 -0700
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        raspl@...ux.ibm.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] net/smc: coordinate wait queues for nonblocking connect

On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:07 AM, Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> index da7f02edcd37..21c84b924ffb 100644
> --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
> +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> @@ -605,6 +605,8 @@ static int smc_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
>
>         smc_copy_sock_settings_to_clc(smc);
>         tcp_sk(smc->clcsock->sk)->syn_smc = 1;
> +       if (flags & O_NONBLOCK)
> +               sock->sk->sk_wq = smc->clcsock->sk->sk_wq;
>         rc = kernel_connect(smc->clcsock, addr, alen, flags);
>         if (rc)
>                 goto out;
> @@ -1285,12 +1287,9 @@ static __poll_t smc_poll_mask(struct socket *sock, __poll_t events)
>
>         smc = smc_sk(sock->sk);
>         sock_hold(sk);
> -       lock_sock(sk);
>         if ((sk->sk_state == SMC_INIT) || smc->use_fallback) {
>                 /* delegate to CLC child sock */
> -               release_sock(sk);
>                 mask = smc->clcsock->ops->poll_mask(smc->clcsock, events);
> -               lock_sock(sk);
>                 sk->sk_err = smc->clcsock->sk->sk_err;
>                 if (sk->sk_err) {
>                         mask |= EPOLLERR;
> @@ -1299,7 +1298,10 @@ static __poll_t smc_poll_mask(struct socket *sock, __poll_t events)
>                         if (sk->sk_state == SMC_INIT &&
>                             mask & EPOLLOUT &&
>                             smc->clcsock->sk->sk_state != TCP_CLOSE) {
> +                               sock->sk->sk_wq = smc->smcwq;
> +                               lock_sock(sk);

I think you need to use proper RCU API to protect these
assignment of sk->sk_wq.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ