[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fccb4f8c0e3070c289c4c110786ac7071f4e61cf.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 14:29:43 +0200
From: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>
To: Roman Mashak <mrv@...atatu.com>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...atatu.com, jhs@...atatu.com,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/5] net sched actions: fix coding style in pedit
action
On Tue, 2018-06-19 at 12:56 -0400, Roman Mashak wrote:
> Fix coding style issues in tc pedit action detected by the
> checkpatch script.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Mashak <mrv@...atatu.com>
...
> ---
> @@ -316,16 +318,15 @@ static int tcf_pedit(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
> hoffset + tkey->at);
> goto bad;
> }
> - d = skb_header_pointer(skb, hoffset + tkey->at, 1,
> - &_d);
> + d = skb_header_pointer(skb, hoffset + tkey->at,
> + 1, &_d);
> if (!d)
> goto bad;
> offset += (*d & tkey->offmask) >> tkey->shift;
> }
hello Roman,
nit: while we are here, what about changing the declaration of _d and *d
to u8, so that the bitwise operation is done on unsigned?
BTW: the patch (and the series) looks ok, but I guess it will better
target net-next when the branch reopens
thanks!
--
davide
Powered by blists - more mailing lists