[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <851sd1fv3i.fsf@mojatatu.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 09:25:37 -0400
From: Roman Mashak <mrv@...atatu.com>
To: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...atatu.com,
jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/5] net sched actions: fix coding style in pedit action
Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2018-06-19 at 12:56 -0400, Roman Mashak wrote:
>> Fix coding style issues in tc pedit action detected by the
>> checkpatch script.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roman Mashak <mrv@...atatu.com>
> ...
>
>> ---
>> @@ -316,16 +318,15 @@ static int tcf_pedit(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
>> hoffset + tkey->at);
>> goto bad;
>> }
>> - d = skb_header_pointer(skb, hoffset + tkey->at, 1,
>> - &_d);
>> + d = skb_header_pointer(skb, hoffset + tkey->at,
>> + 1, &_d);
>> if (!d)
>> goto bad;
>> offset += (*d & tkey->offmask) >> tkey->shift;
>> }
>
> hello Roman,
>
> nit: while we are here, what about changing the declaration of _d and *d
> to u8, so that the bitwise operation is done on unsigned?
Yes makes sense, I will send v2 in net-next once opened. Thanks Davide.
> BTW: the patch (and the series) looks ok, but I guess it will better
> target net-next when the branch reopens
Powered by blists - more mailing lists