[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fcec2b1b-e2ab-3404-d958-b62d6d91583a@zonque.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 22:34:39 +0200
From: Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"libertas-dev@...ts.infradead.org" <libertas-dev@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Suspend of SDIO function devices
Hi Ulf,
Thanks for the prompt reply!
On Monday, June 25, 2018 05:00 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 24 June 2018 at 22:46, Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org> wrote:
>> Please advise, I'm happy to test approaches and send patches.
>
> From a top level point of view, I think this needs to be changed:
>
> 1)
> In cases when the libertas sdio driver's ->suspend() callback, thinks
> of returning -ENOSYS, it should instead call if_sdio_power_off().
> Depending if if_sdio_power_save() has already been called, this shall
> be skipped.
>
> The important thing here is to disable the SDIO func device and to
> release the SDIO irq.
>
> 2)
> During resume, depending on whether the earlier ->suspend() callback
> invoked if_sdio_power_off(), libertas sdio driver's ->resume()
> callback should call if_sdio_power_on().
>
> This should re-initiate the libertas sdio device and re-program the
> firmware. To complete these actions, the firmware file also needs to
> be fetched, which requires file system accesses also to be resumed.
>
> We also need to wait for the firmware programming to be completed,
> hence also do a "wait_event(card->pwron_waitq, priv->fw_ready);" from
> somewhere.
Great, thanks, that helped a lot! I have something that does the job ob
my board. Will send out a patch shortly.
Best regards,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists