netdev - Re: [PATCH rdma-next 00/12] RDMA fixes 2018-06-24

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180626203921.GF5381@ziepe.ca>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:39:21 -0600
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
        Michael J Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@...el.com>,
        Noa Osherovich <noaos@...lanox.com>,
        Raed Salem <raeds@...lanox.com>,
        Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 00/12] RDMA fixes 2018-06-24

On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 07:21:26AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 03:34:38PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 11:23:41AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This is bunch of patches trigged by running syzkaller internally.
> > >
> > > I'm sending them based on rdma-next mainly for two reasons:
> > > 1, Most of the patches fix the old issues and it doesn't matter when
> > > they will hit the Linus's tree: now or later in a couple of weeks
> > > during merge window.
> > > 2. They interleave with code cleanup, mlx5-next patches and Michael's
> > > feedback on flow counters series.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Leon Romanovsky (12):
> > >   RDMA/uverbs: Protect from attempts to create flows on unsupported QP
> > >   RDMA/uverbs: Fix slab-out-of-bounds in ib_uverbs_ex_create_flow
> >
> > I applied these two to for-rc
> >
> > >   RDMA/uverbs: Check existence of create_flow callback
> > >   RDMA/verbs: Drop kernel variant of create_flow
> > >   RDMA/verbs: Drop kernel variant of destroy_flow
> > >   net/mlx5: Rate limit errors in command interface
> > >   RDMA/uverbs: Don't overwrite NULL pointer with ZERO_SIZE_PTR
> > >   RDMA/umem: Don't check for negative return value of dma_map_sg_attrs()
> > >   RDMA/uverbs: Remove redundant check
> >
> > These to for-next
> 
> Jason,
> 
> We would like to see patch "[PATCH mlx5-next 05/12] net/mlx5:
> Rate limit errors in command interface" in out mlx5-next. Is it possible
> at this point to drop it from for-next, so I'll be able to take it into
> mlx5-next?

Okay, you got to this while it was still 'wip', so it is dropped. Add
it to the mlx5-next branch and netdev or rdma can pull it next time
there is some reason to pull the branch..

Jason