netdev - Re: [PATCH rdma-next 00/12] RDMA fixes 2018-06-24

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180626042126.GM17747@mtr-leonro.mtl.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Jun 2018 07:21:26 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
        Michael J Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@...el.com>,
        Noa Osherovich <noaos@...lanox.com>,
        Raed Salem <raeds@...lanox.com>,
        Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 00/12] RDMA fixes 2018-06-24

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 03:34:38PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 11:23:41AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is bunch of patches trigged by running syzkaller internally.
> >
> > I'm sending them based on rdma-next mainly for two reasons:
> > 1, Most of the patches fix the old issues and it doesn't matter when
> > they will hit the Linus's tree: now or later in a couple of weeks
> > during merge window.
> > 2. They interleave with code cleanup, mlx5-next patches and Michael's
> > feedback on flow counters series.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Leon Romanovsky (12):
> >   RDMA/uverbs: Protect from attempts to create flows on unsupported QP
> >   RDMA/uverbs: Fix slab-out-of-bounds in ib_uverbs_ex_create_flow
>
> I applied these two to for-rc
>
> >   RDMA/uverbs: Check existence of create_flow callback
> >   RDMA/verbs: Drop kernel variant of create_flow
> >   RDMA/verbs: Drop kernel variant of destroy_flow
> >   net/mlx5: Rate limit errors in command interface
> >   RDMA/uverbs: Don't overwrite NULL pointer with ZERO_SIZE_PTR
> >   RDMA/umem: Don't check for negative return value of dma_map_sg_attrs()
> >   RDMA/uverbs: Remove redundant check
>
> These to for-next

Jason,

We would like to see patch "[PATCH mlx5-next 05/12] net/mlx5:
Rate limit errors in command interface" in out mlx5-next. Is it possible
at this point to drop it from for-next, so I'll be able to take it into
mlx5-next?

Thanks

>
> >   overflow.h: Add arithmetic shift helper
> >   RDMA/mlx5: Fix shift overflow in mlx5_ib_create_wq
> >   RDMA/mlx5: Reuse existed shift_overlow helper
>
> And these will have to be respun.
>
> Thanks,
> Jason

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)