netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: replace LINUX_MIB_TCPOFODROP with LINUX_MIB_TCPRMEMFULLDROP for drops due to receive buffer full

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c89b70f9-e70d-35a5-b9a7-7e3ed7d34edf@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Jun 2018 07:48:54 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>, edumazet@...gle.com,
        davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: replace LINUX_MIB_TCPOFODROP with
 LINUX_MIB_TCPRMEMFULLDROP for drops due to receive buffer full



On 06/27/2018 04:50 AM, Yafang Shao wrote:
> When sk_rmem_alloc is larger than the receive buffer and we can't
> schedule more memory for it, the skb will be dropped.
> 
> In above situation, if this skb is put into the ofo queue,
> LINUX_MIB_TCPOFODROP is incremented to track it,
> while if this skb is put into the receive queue, there's no record.
> 
> So LINUX_MIB_TCPOFODROP is replaced with LINUX_MIB_TCPRMEMFULLDROP to track
> this behavior.


Hi Yafang

I do not want to remove TCPOFODrop and mix multiple causes in one single counter.

Please take a look at commit a6df1ae9383697c to have the reasoning.

Thanks.