netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: replace LINUX_MIB_TCPOFODROP with LINUX_MIB_TCPRMEMFULLDROP for drops due to receive buffer full

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALOAHbCdRjq2n37GpeBdorcbxXMDX2vNDLftypViJd5hRTA28A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Jun 2018 23:14:30 +0800
From:   Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: replace LINUX_MIB_TCPOFODROP with
 LINUX_MIB_TCPRMEMFULLDROP for drops due to receive buffer full

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 10:48 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 06/27/2018 04:50 AM, Yafang Shao wrote:
>> When sk_rmem_alloc is larger than the receive buffer and we can't
>> schedule more memory for it, the skb will be dropped.
>>
>> In above situation, if this skb is put into the ofo queue,
>> LINUX_MIB_TCPOFODROP is incremented to track it,
>> while if this skb is put into the receive queue, there's no record.
>>
>> So LINUX_MIB_TCPOFODROP is replaced with LINUX_MIB_TCPRMEMFULLDROP to track
>> this behavior.
>
>
> Hi Yafang
>
> I do not want to remove TCPOFODrop and mix multiple causes in one single counter.
>
> Please take a look at commit a6df1ae9383697c to have the reasoning.
>

Got it!

What about introduce a new counter, i.e. TCPRcvQFullDrop ?

Thanks
Yafang