netdev - Re: [patch net-next v2 0/9] net: sched: introduce chain templates support with offloading to mlxsw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1dbc630d-2da3-afbe-18ba-e9dfc893bf04@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Jun 2018 09:10:45 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, jhs@...atatu.com,
        xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com,
        simon.horman@...ronome.com, john.hurley@...ronome.com,
        mlxsw@...lanox.com, sridhar.samudrala@...el.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 0/9] net: sched: introduce chain templates
 support with offloading to mlxsw

On 6/28/18 8:29 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 04:18:47PM CEST, dsahern@...il.com wrote:
>> On 6/28/18 7:08 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Create dummy device with clsact first:
>>> # ip link add type dummy
>>> # tc qdisc add dev dummy0 clsact
>>>
>>> There is no template assigned by default:
>>> # tc chaintemplate show dev dummy0 ingress
>>>
>>> Add a template of type flower allowing to insert rules matching on last
>>> 2 bytes of destination mac address:
>>> # tc chaintemplate add dev dummy0 ingress proto ip flower dst_mac 00:00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:FF:FF
>>>
>>> The template is now showed in the list:
>>> # tc chaintemplate show dev dummy0 ingress
>>> chaintemplate flower chain 0 
>>>   dst_mac 00:00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:ff:ff
>>>   eth_type ipv4
>>>
>>> Add another template, this time for chain number 22:
>>> # tc chaintemplate add dev dummy0 ingress proto ip chain 22 flower dst_ip 0.0.0.0/16
>>> # tc chaintemplate show dev dummy0 ingress
>>> chaintemplate flower chain 0 
>>>   dst_mac 00:00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:ff:ff
>>>   eth_type ipv4
>>> chaintemplate flower chain 22 
>>>   eth_type ipv4
>>>   dst_ip 0.0.0.0/16
>>>
>>> Add a filter that fits the template:
>>> # tc filter add dev dummy0 ingress proto ip flower dst_mac aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff/00:00:00:00:00:0F action drop
>>>
>>> Addition of filters that does not fit the template would fail:
>>> # tc filter add dev dummy0 ingress proto ip flower dst_mac aa:11:22:33:44:55/00:00:00:FF:00:00 action drop
>>> Error: Mask does not fit the template.
>>> We have an error talking to the kernel, -1
>>> # tc filter add dev dummy0 ingress proto ip flower dst_ip 10.0.0.1 action drop
>>> Error: Mask does not fit the template.
>>> We have an error talking to the kernel, -1
>>>
>>> Additions of filters to chain 22:
>>> # tc filter add dev dummy0 ingress proto ip chain 22 flower dst_ip 10.0.0.1/8 action drop
>>> # tc filter add dev dummy0 ingress proto ip chain 22 flower dst_ip 10.0.0.1 action drop
>>> Error: Mask does not fit the template.
>>> We have an error talking to the kernel, -1
>>> # tc filter add dev dummy0 ingress proto ip chain 22 flower dst_ip 10.0.0.1/24 action drop
>>> Error: Mask does not fit the template.
>>> We have an error talking to the kernel, -1
>>>
>>> Removal of a template from non-empty chain would fail:
>>> # tc chaintemplate del dev dummy0 ingress
>>> Error: The chain is not empty, unable to delete template.
>>> We have an error talking to the kernel, -1
>>
>> Why this restriction? It's a template, so why can't it be removed
>> regardless of whether there are filters?
> 
> That means you could start to insert filters that does not match the
> original template. I wanted to avoid it. The chain is utilized in hw for
> the original template, the filter insertion would have to be sanitized
> in driver. With this restriction, drivers can depend on filters always
> be fitting.
> 

Then the hardware driver should have that restriction not the core tc code.