| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2f5d20a0-cc95-ed37-3f6c-3368f92a7586@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 13:55:18 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
Cc: mst@...hat.com, makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Tonghao Zhang <zhangtonghao@...ichuxing.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic
to vhost_net_busy_poll()
On 2018年07月03日 13:48, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 10:12 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2018年07月02日 20:57, xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com wrote:
>>> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
>>>
>>> Factor out generic busy polling logic and will be
>>> used for in tx path in the next patch. And with the patch,
>>> qemu can set differently the busyloop_timeout for rx queue.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <zhangtonghao@...ichuxing.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/vhost/net.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
>>> index 62bb8e8..2790959 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
>>> @@ -429,6 +429,52 @@ static int vhost_net_enable_vq(struct vhost_net *n,
>>> return vhost_poll_start(poll, sock->file);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int sk_has_rx_data(struct sock *sk)
>>> +{
>>> + struct socket *sock = sk->sk_socket;
>>> +
>>> + if (sock->ops->peek_len)
>>> + return sock->ops->peek_len(sock);
>>> +
>>> + return skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void vhost_net_busy_poll(struct vhost_net *net,
>>> + struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq,
>>> + struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq,
>>> + bool rx)
>>> +{
>>> + unsigned long uninitialized_var(endtime);
>>> + unsigned long busyloop_timeout;
>>> + struct socket *sock;
>>> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = rx ? tvq : rvq;
>>> +
>>> + mutex_lock_nested(&vq->mutex, rx ? VHOST_NET_VQ_TX: VHOST_NET_VQ_RX);
>>> +
>>> + vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
>>> + sock = rvq->private_data;
>>> + busyloop_timeout = rx ? rvq->busyloop_timeout : tvq->busyloop_timeout;
>>> +
>>> + preempt_disable();
>>> + endtime = busy_clock() + busyloop_timeout;
>>> + while (vhost_can_busy_poll(tvq->dev, endtime) &&
>>> + !(sock && sk_has_rx_data(sock->sk)) &&
>>> + vhost_vq_avail_empty(tvq->dev, tvq))
>>> + cpu_relax();
>>> + preempt_enable();
>>> +
>>> + if ((rx && !vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, vq)) ||
>>> + (!rx && (sock && sk_has_rx_data(sock->sk)))) {
>>> + vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
>>> + } else if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, vq))) {
>> One last question, do we need this for rx? This check will be always
>> true under light or medium load.
> will remove the 'unlikely'
Not only the unlikely. We only want rx kick when packet is pending at
socket but we're out of available buffers. This is not the case here
(you have polled the vq above).
So we probably want to do this only when rx == true.
Thanks
>
>> Thanks
>>
>>> + vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
>>> + vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +
>>> static int vhost_net_tx_get_vq_desc(struct vhost_net *net,
>>> struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
>>> struct iovec iov[], unsigned int iov_size,
>>> @@ -621,16 +667,6 @@ static int peek_head_len(struct vhost_net_virtqueue *rvq, struct sock *sk)
>>> return len;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static int sk_has_rx_data(struct sock *sk)
>>> -{
>>> - struct socket *sock = sk->sk_socket;
>>> -
>>> - if (sock->ops->peek_len)
>>> - return sock->ops->peek_len(sock);
>>> -
>>> - return skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> static void vhost_rx_signal_used(struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq)
>>> {
>>> struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &nvq->vq;
>>> @@ -645,39 +681,19 @@ static void vhost_rx_signal_used(struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq)
>>>
>>> static int vhost_net_rx_peek_head_len(struct vhost_net *net, struct sock *sk)
>>> {
>>> - struct vhost_net_virtqueue *rvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_RX];
>>> - struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX];
>>> - struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &nvq->vq;
>>> - unsigned long uninitialized_var(endtime);
>>> - int len = peek_head_len(rvq, sk);
>>> + struct vhost_net_virtqueue *rnvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_RX];
>>> + struct vhost_net_virtqueue *tnvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX];
>>>
>>> - if (!len && vq->busyloop_timeout) {
>>> - /* Flush batched heads first */
>>> - vhost_rx_signal_used(rvq);
>>> - /* Both tx vq and rx socket were polled here */
>>> - mutex_lock_nested(&vq->mutex, VHOST_NET_VQ_TX);
>>> - vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
>>> + int len = peek_head_len(rnvq, sk);
>>>
>>> - preempt_disable();
>>> - endtime = busy_clock() + vq->busyloop_timeout;
>>> -
>>> - while (vhost_can_busy_poll(&net->dev, endtime) &&
>>> - !sk_has_rx_data(sk) &&
>>> - vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, vq))
>>> - cpu_relax();
>>> -
>>> - preempt_enable();
>>> -
>>> - if (!vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, vq))
>>> - vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
>>> - else if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, vq))) {
>>> - vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
>>> - vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
>>> - }
>>> + if (!len && rnvq->vq.busyloop_timeout) {
>>> + /* Flush batched heads first */
>>> + vhost_rx_signal_used(rnvq);
>>>
>>> - mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
>>> + /* Both tx vq and rx socket were polled here */
>>> + vhost_net_busy_poll(net, &rnvq->vq, &tnvq->vq, true);
>>>
>>> - len = peek_head_len(rvq, sk);
>>> + len = peek_head_len(rnvq, sk);
>>> }
>>>
>>> return len;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists