lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJFZqHw_57y4q20Jsm3dVQ_MKOMGumayGHBZnG+e=A-j+W7Z5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Jul 2018 14:21:48 +0800
From:   Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     lirongqing@...du.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][net-next] net: increase MAX_GRO_SKBS to 64

On 7/2/18, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>
> Date: Mon,  2 Jul 2018 19:41:43 +0800
>
>> After 07d78363dcffd [net: Convert NAPI gro list into a small hash table]
>> there is 8 hash buckets, which allow more flows to be held for merging.
>>
>> keep each as original list length, so increase MAX_GRO_SKBS to 64
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>
>
> I would like to hear some feedback from Eric, 64 might be too big.
>
How about the below change?

commit 6270b973a973b2944fedb4b5f9926ed3e379d0c2 (HEAD -> master)
Author: Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>
Date:   Mon Jul 2 19:08:37 2018 +0800

    net: limit each hash list length to MAX_GRO_SKBS

    After 07d78363dcffd [net: Convert NAPI gro list into a small hash table]
    there is 8 hash buckets, which allows more flows to be held for merging.
    but MAX_GRO_SKBS, the total held skb for merging, is 8 skb still, limit
    the hash table performance.

    keep MAX_GRO_SKBS as 8 skb, but limit each hash list length to 8 skb, not
    the total 8 skb

    Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>

diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 8bf8d6149f79..09d7764a8917 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -324,6 +324,7 @@ struct napi_struct {
 #endif
        struct net_device       *dev;
        struct list_head        gro_hash[GRO_HASH_BUCKETS];
+       int             list_len[GRO_HASH_BUCKETS];
        struct sk_buff          *skb;
        struct hrtimer          timer;
        struct list_head        dev_list;
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 08d58e0debe5..3cf3c6676cb3 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -149,7 +149,6 @@

 #include "net-sysfs.h"

-/* Instead of increasing this, you should create a hash table. */
 #define MAX_GRO_SKBS 8

 /* This should be increased if a protocol with a bigger head is added. */
@@ -4989,10 +4988,11 @@ static int napi_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb)
        return netif_receive_skb_internal(skb);
 }

-static void __napi_gro_flush_chain(struct napi_struct *napi, struct
list_head *head,
+static void __napi_gro_flush_chain(struct napi_struct *napi, int index,
                                   bool flush_old)
 {
        struct sk_buff *skb, *p;
+       struct list_head *head = &napi->gro_hash[index];

        list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(skb, p, head, list) {
                if (flush_old && NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->age == jiffies)
@@ -5000,6 +5000,7 @@ static void __napi_gro_flush_chain(struct
napi_struct *napi, struct list_head *h
                list_del_init(&skb->list);
                napi_gro_complete(skb);
                napi->gro_count--;
+               napi->list_len[index]--;
        }
 }

@@ -5011,11 +5012,8 @@ void napi_gro_flush(struct napi_struct *napi,
bool flush_old)
 {
        int i;

-       for (i = 0; i < GRO_HASH_BUCKETS; i++) {
-               struct list_head *head = &napi->gro_hash[i];
-
-               __napi_gro_flush_chain(napi, head, flush_old);
-       }
+       for (i = 0; i < GRO_HASH_BUCKETS; i++)
+               __napi_gro_flush_chain(napi, i, flush_old);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(napi_gro_flush);

@@ -5095,27 +5093,13 @@ static void gro_pull_from_frag0(struct sk_buff
*skb, int grow)
        }
 }

-static void gro_flush_oldest(struct napi_struct *napi)
+static void gro_flush_oldest(struct list_head *head)
 {
        struct sk_buff *oldest = NULL;
-       unsigned long age = jiffies;
-       int i;

-       for (i = 0; i < GRO_HASH_BUCKETS; i++) {
-               struct list_head *head = &napi->gro_hash[i];
-               struct sk_buff *skb;
+       oldest = list_last_entry(head, struct sk_buff, list);

-               if (list_empty(head))
-                       continue;
-
-               skb = list_last_entry(head, struct sk_buff, list);
-               if (!oldest || time_before(NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->age, age)) {
-                       oldest = skb;
-                       age = NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->age;
-               }
-       }
-
-       /* We are called with napi->gro_count >= MAX_GRO_SKBS, so this is
+       /* We are called with head length >= MAX_GRO_SKBS, so this is
         * impossible.
         */
        if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!oldest))
@@ -5138,6 +5122,7 @@ static enum gro_result dev_gro_receive(struct
napi_struct *napi, struct sk_buff
        enum gro_result ret;
        int same_flow;
        int grow;
+       u32 hash = skb_get_hash_raw(skb) & (GRO_HASH_BUCKETS - 1);

        if (netif_elide_gro(skb->dev))
                goto normal;
@@ -5196,6 +5181,7 @@ static enum gro_result dev_gro_receive(struct
napi_struct *napi, struct sk_buff
                list_del_init(&pp->list);
                napi_gro_complete(pp);
                napi->gro_count--;
+               napi->list_len[hash]--;
        }

        if (same_flow)
@@ -5204,10 +5190,11 @@ static enum gro_result dev_gro_receive(struct
napi_struct *napi, struct sk_buff
        if (NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->flush)
                goto normal;

-       if (unlikely(napi->gro_count >= MAX_GRO_SKBS)) {
-               gro_flush_oldest(napi);
+       if (unlikely(napi->list_len[hash] >= MAX_GRO_SKBS)) {
+               gro_flush_oldest(gro_head);
        } else {
                napi->gro_count++;
+               napi->list_len[hash]++;
        }
        NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->count = 1;
        NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->age = jiffies;
@@ -5844,8 +5831,10 @@ void netif_napi_add(struct net_device *dev,
struct napi_struct *napi,
        hrtimer_init(&napi->timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED);
        napi->timer.function = napi_watchdog;
        napi->gro_count = 0;
-       for (i = 0; i < GRO_HASH_BUCKETS; i++)
+       for (i = 0; i < GRO_HASH_BUCKETS; i++) {
                INIT_LIST_HEAD(&napi->gro_hash[i]);
+               napi->list_len[i] = 0;
+       }
        napi->skb = NULL;
        napi->poll = poll;
        if (weight > NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT)
@@ -5887,6 +5876,7 @@ static void flush_gro_hash(struct napi_struct *napi)

                list_for_each_entry_safe(skb, n, &napi->gro_hash[i], list)
                        kfree_skb(skb);
+               napi->list_len[i] = 0;
        }
 }

-R

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ