[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180704114355.GB11693@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 12:43:55 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jian-Hong Pan <starnight@...cu.edu.tw>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>,
Janus Piwek <jpiwek@...oweurope.com>,
Michael Röder <michael.roeder@...et.eu>,
Dollar Chen <dollar.chen@...ec.com>,
Ken Yu <ken.yu@...wireless.com>,
Ben Whitten <ben.whitten@...rdtech.com>,
Steve deRosier <derosier@...il.com>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
LoRa_Community_Support@...tech.com,
Hasnain Virk <Hasnain.Virk@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 15/15] net: lora: Add Semtech SX1301
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 06:40:41PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Do you have an alternative solution for abstraction? A regmap would seem
> to require putting everything into a monolithic SX1301 driver despite
> those connected chipsets actually being regular, external SPI chips that
> could also be attached to non-SX1301 SPI masters.
I'm suggesting a regmap for those external SPI chips. It doesn't matter
what the host uses.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists