[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180704.213147.556876353476580416.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2018 21:31:47 +0900 (KST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp
Cc: mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/4] vhost_net: Avoid vq kicks during
busyloop
From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 16:31:30 +0900
> Under heavy load vhost tx busypoll tend not to suppress vq kicks, which
> causes poor guest tx performance. The detailed scenario is described in
> commitlog of patch 2.
> Rx seems not to have that serious problem, but for consistency I made a
> similar change on rx to avoid rx wakeups (patch 3).
> Additionary patch 4 is to avoid rx kicks under heavy load during
> busypoll.
>
> Tx performance is greatly improved by this change. I don't see notable
> performance change on rx with this series though.
...
Series applied, thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists