[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <edc6d81e-c373-56e4-2785-e55aaaca0f07@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 14:42:43 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Stefan Baranoff <sbaranoff@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Andrey Vagin <avagin@...tuozzo.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...tuozzo.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: allow user to create repair socket without window
probes
On 07/13/2018 02:36 PM, Stefan Baranoff wrote:
>
> Before I put my foot in my mouth one more time and end up on everyone's naughty list - can someone help guide me on a couple of questions?
>
> What is the correct way to resubmit this, just as a simple v2 or does it need cherry picked out and moved over to net-next somehow?
> Part of the fix is to remember to include my header file changes to increase the size of repair from 1 bit to 2 in include/linux/tcp.h - does that make this patch's change require any additional work, notices, etc?
Patch was officially merged, so there wont be a V2.
Please send a patch to fix the issue on top of current David net tree
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists