[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180713.151110.334103662560259751.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 15:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: xiyou.wangcong@...il.com
Cc: vladbu@...lanox.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jhs@...atatu.com,
jiri@...nulli.us, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
kliteyn@...lanox.com, jiri@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 01/11] net: sched: use rcu for action
cookie update
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 14:51:15 -0700
> Can we at least agree you have no justification for this change in
> this changelog?
He stated that he wishes to make this subsystem more lockless, and he
cannot do that without making the action cookie handling use RCU.
I agree with the stated goal, and the necessity of this kind of change.
Therefore I applied the patch.
I really don't see what the problem is.
I also gave a couple days for this patch set to get reviewed. If you
have a problem, please respond to the patch posting. When I see nobody
is reviewing, that is when I step in and make my own judgment.
So when you want your objection to be heard, please do so in a timely
manner. That helps all of us.
Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists