netdev - Re: [PATCH] lib/rhashtable: consider param->min

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180717185815.20e5662318274aadcf9a9357@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 17 Jul 2018 18:58:15 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, tgraf@...g.ch,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/rhashtable: consider param->min_size when setting
 initial table size

On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 15:30:57 -0700 Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net> wrote:

> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Herbert Xu wrote:
> 
> >On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 11:25:16PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> >> rhashtable_init() currently does not take into account the user-passed
> >> min_size parameter unless param->nelem_hint is set as well. As such,
> >> the default size (number of buckets) will always be HASH_DEFAULT_SIZE
> >> even if the smallest allowed size is larger than that. Remediate this
> >> by unconditionally calling into rounded_hashtable_size() and handling
> >> things accordingly.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
> >
> >Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> >
> >Normally these patches go through netdev so could you please resend
> >it with my ack to netdev@...r.kernel.org?
> 
> So I've done the resend, but at least would think that routing the
> patch through Andrew would work best as he picked up the rhashtable
> changes regarding ipc and this touches the same call.
> 

Either approach works.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>