[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f0406f6a-ef26-5fe0-1fb4-1eda676743f5@iogearbox.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 11:33:22 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc: dsahern@...il.com, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 5/5] bpf: implement btf handling and map
annotation
On 07/18/2018 10:42 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 07/18/2018 02:27 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 01:31:22 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>> # bpftool map dump id 386
>>> [{
>>> "key": 0,
>>> "value": {
>>> "": {
>>> "value": 0,
>>> "ifindex": 0,
>>> "mac": []
>>> }
>>> }
>>> },{
>>> "key": 1,
>>> "value": {
>>> "": {
>>> "value": 0,
>>> "ifindex": 0,
>>> "mac": []
>>> }
>>> }
>>> },{
>>> [...]
>>
>> Ugh, the empty keys ("") look worrying, we should probably improve
>> handling of anonymous structs in bpftool :S
>
> Yeah agree, I think it would be nice to see a more pahole style dump
> where we have types and member names along with the value as otherwise
> it might be a bit confusing.
Another feature that would be super useful imho would be in the /single/
map view e.g. 'bpftool map show id 123' to have a detailed BTF key+value
type dump, so in addition to the basic map info we show pahole like info
of the structs with length/offsets.
>> FWIW all the patches look nice to me! Thanks for keeping the support
>> for loading programs from the ".text" section :)
>
> The test_offload.py from BPF kselftests helped a lot in that! :)
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists