netdev - Re: [PATCH 03/10] atmel: hide unused procfs helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3684c95c-6df1-183e-8940-807dfb49e5bb@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Jul 2018 18:02:29 +0800
From:   YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
CC:     <simon@...kelleys.org.uk>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] atmel: hide unused procfs helpers

On 2018/7/27 17:24, Kalle Valo wrote:
> (fixing top posting)
> 
> YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com> writes:
> 
>> On 2018/7/13 14:46, YueHaibing wrote:
>>> When CONFIG_PROC_FS isn't set, gcc warning this:
>>>
>>> drivers/net/wireless/atmel/atmel.c:1402:12: warning: ‘atmel_proc_show’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>>>  static int atmel_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>>>             ^
>>> fix this by adding #ifdef around it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
>>
>> pls ignore this,my bad.
> 
> Why should I drop this? Does the patch have something wrong which I'm
> missing?

No,the patch is ok,just because I find this issue has a fix patch from Randy.

> 
> I'm asking because I prefer this over Randy's version:
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10512913/
>