netdev - Re: [PATCH 03/10] atmel: hide unused procfs helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e6100005-2c8e-b1b9-2870-b8ca2d61fe30@infradead.org>
Date:   Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:44:54 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Cc:     simon@...kelleys.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] atmel: hide unused procfs helpers

On 07/27/2018 02:24 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> (fixing top posting)
> 
> YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com> writes:
> 
>> On 2018/7/13 14:46, YueHaibing wrote:
>>> When CONFIG_PROC_FS isn't set, gcc warning this:
>>>
>>> drivers/net/wireless/atmel/atmel.c:1402:12: warning: ‘atmel_proc_show’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>>>  static int atmel_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>>>             ^
>>> fix this by adding #ifdef around it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
>>
>> pls ignore this,my bad.
> 
> Why should I drop this? Does the patch have something wrong which I'm
> missing?
> 
> I'm asking because I prefer this over Randy's version:
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10512913/

Take it.  I don't mind.

-- 
~Randy