[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180730132259.6338-1-ap420073@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 22:22:59 +0900
From: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
To: daniel@...earbox.net, ast@...nel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ap420073@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] lwt_bpf: remove unnecessary rcu_read_lock in run_lwt_bpf
run_lwt_bpf is called by bpf_{input/output/xmit}.
These functions are already protected by rcu_read_lock.
because lwtunnel_{input/output/xmit} holds rcu_read_lock
and then calls bpf_{input/output/xmit}.
So that rcu_read_lock in the run_lwt_bpf is unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
---
net/core/lwt_bpf.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/lwt_bpf.c b/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
index e7e626f..a49c7ba 100644
--- a/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
+++ b/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
@@ -50,10 +50,8 @@ static int run_lwt_bpf(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bpf_lwt_prog *lwt,
* mixing with BH RCU lock doesn't work.
*/
preempt_disable();
- rcu_read_lock();
bpf_compute_data_pointers(skb);
ret = bpf_prog_run_save_cb(lwt->prog, skb);
- rcu_read_unlock();
switch (ret) {
case BPF_OK:
--
2.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists