netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] xsk: improvements to RX queue check and replace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180731.094846.1188284010173856034.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 31 Jul 2018 09:48:46 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     daniel@...earbox.net
Cc:     jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
        bjorn.topel@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] xsk: improvements to RX queue check and
 replace

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 09:50:12 +0200

> On 07/31/2018 05:43 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> Hi!
>> 
>> First 3 patches of my recent RFC.  The first one make the check against
>> real_num_rx_queues slightly more reliable, while the latter two redefine
>> XDP_QUERY_XSK_UMEM slightly to disallow replacing UMEM in the driver at
>> the stack level.
>> 
>> I'm not sure where this lays on the bpf vs net trees scale, but there
>> should be no conflicts with either tree.
> 
> I'm fine either way, in any case, series looks good to me:
> 
> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>

Series applied to net-next then :)