[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1808171606520.2385@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 16:08:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sunhme: convert printk to pr_cont
On Fri, 17 Aug 2018, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 15:12:22 -0400 (EDT)
> Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-stable.orig/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunhme.c 2018-04-20 18:11:00.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-stable/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/sunhme.c 2018-08-13 22:01:08.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -572,21 +572,21 @@ static void display_link_mode(struct hap
> > {
> > printk(KERN_INFO "%s: Link is up using ", hp->dev->name);
> > if (hp->tcvr_type == external)
> > - printk("external ");
> > + pr_cont("external ");
> > else
> > - printk("internal ");
> > - printk("transceiver at ");
> > + pr_cont("internal ");
> > + pr_cont("transceiver at ");
> > hp->sw_lpa = happy_meal_tcvr_read(hp, tregs, MII_LPA);
> > if (hp->sw_lpa & (LPA_100HALF | LPA_100FULL)) {
> > if (hp->sw_lpa & LPA_100FULL)
> > - printk("100Mb/s, Full Duplex.\n");
> > + pr_cont("100Mb/s, Full Duplex.\n");
> > else
> > - printk("100Mb/s, Half Duplex.\n");
> > + pr_cont("100Mb/s, Half Duplex.\n");
> > } else {
> > if (hp->sw_lpa & LPA_10FULL)
> > - printk("10Mb/s, Full Duplex.\n");
> > + pr_cont("10Mb/s, Full Duplex.\n");
> > else
> > - printk("10Mb/s, Half Duplex.\n");
> > + pr_cont("10Mb/s, Half Duplex.\n");
> > }
> > }
>
> Why not just use a single netdev_info (or drop the useless message altogether).
>
> I.e
> netdev_info(hp->dev, "Link is up using %s transceiver at %dMb/s %s Duplex\n",
> (hp->tcvr->type == external) ? "external" : "internal",
> (hp->sw_lpa & (LPA_100HALF | LPA_100FULL)) ? 100 : 10,
> (hw->sw_lpa & (LPA_100FULL | LPA_10FULL)) ? "Full" : "Half"));
I'm not an expert on networking code - you can change it if it is more
appropriate this way.
Mikulas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists