netdev - Re: [PATCH mlx5-next] RDMA/mlx5: Don't use cached IRQ affinity mask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180817201701.GJ28676@mellanox.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Aug 2018 14:17:01 -0600
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
To:     Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Cc:     Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
        'Max Gurtovoy' <maxg@...lanox.com>,
        'Leon Romanovsky' <leon@...nel.org>,
        'Doug Ledford' <dledford@...hat.com>,
        'RDMA mailing list' <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        'Saeed Mahameed' <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        'linux-netdev' <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next] RDMA/mlx5: Don't use cached IRQ affinity mask

On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 01:03:20PM -0700, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> 
> > Hey Sagi,
> > 
> > The patch works allowing connections for the various affinity mappings below:
> > 
> > One comp_vector per core across all cores, starting with numa-local cores:
> 
> Thanks Steve, is this your "Tested by:" tag?

The new patchworks doesn't grab patches inlined in messages, so you
will need to resend it.

Also, can someone remind me what the outcome is here? Does it
supersede Leon's patch:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10526167/

?

Thanks,
Jason