netdev - Re: [PATCH mlx5-next] RDMA/mlx5: Don't use cached IRQ affinity mask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ee2d312e-991f-6a63-4152-ed8ecfab1c05@grimberg.me>
Date:   Fri, 17 Aug 2018 13:26:41 -0700
From:   Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Cc:     Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
        'Max Gurtovoy' <maxg@...lanox.com>,
        'Leon Romanovsky' <leon@...nel.org>,
        'Doug Ledford' <dledford@...hat.com>,
        'RDMA mailing list' <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        'Saeed Mahameed' <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        'linux-netdev' <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next] RDMA/mlx5: Don't use cached IRQ affinity mask

Hi Jason,

> The new patchworks doesn't grab patches inlined in messages, so you
> will need to resend it.

Yes, just wanted to to add Steve's tested by as its going to
lists that did not follow this thread.

> Also, can someone remind me what the outcome is here? Does it
> supersede Leon's patch:
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10526167/

Leon's patch is exposing the breakage so I think it would be
wise to have it go in after this lands mainline.