netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: net: cpsw: Document cpsw-phy-sel usage but prefer phandle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180902.135243.1983575431820096428.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Sun, 02 Sep 2018 13:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     tony@...mide.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch,
        grygorii.strashko@...com, ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, m-karicheri2@...com, robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: net: cpsw: Document cpsw-phy-sel
 usage but prefer phandle

From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 08:00:23 -0700

> The current cpsw usage for cpsw-phy-sel is undocumented but is used for
> all the boards using cpsw. And cpsw-phy-sel is not really a child of
> the cpsw device, it lives in the system control module instead.
> 
> Let's document the existing usage, and improve it a bit where we prefer
> to use a phandle instead of a child device for it. That way we can
> properly describe the hardware in dts files for things like genpd.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>

Applied.