[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180903134522.GC13888@piout.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 15:45:22 +0200
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...tlin.com>, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
paul.burton@...s.com, jhogan@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, davem@...emloft.net, kishon@...com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, allan.nielsen@...rochip.com,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] mscc: ocelot: add support for SerDes muxing
configuration
On 03/09/2018 15:34:15+0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > I suggest patches 1 and 8 go through MIPS tree, 2 to 5 and 11 go through
> > net while the others (6, 7, 9 and 10) go through the generic PHY subsystem.
>
> Hi Quentin
>
> Are you expecting merge conflicts? If not, it might be simpler to gets
> ACKs from each maintainer, and then merge it though one tree.
>
There are some other DT changes for this cycle so those should probably
go through MIPS.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists