netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] mscc: ocelot: add support for SerDes muxing configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180903.220910.899357653888940454.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Mon, 03 Sep 2018 22:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com
Cc:     andrew@...n.ch, quentin.schulz@...tlin.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
        paul.burton@...s.com, jhogan@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, kishon@...com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        allan.nielsen@...rochip.com, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] mscc: ocelot: add support for SerDes muxing
 configuration

From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 15:45:22 +0200

> On 03/09/2018 15:34:15+0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> > I suggest patches 1 and 8 go through MIPS tree, 2 to 5 and 11 go through
>> > net while the others (6, 7, 9 and 10) go through the generic PHY subsystem.
>> 
>> Hi Quentin
>> 
>> Are you expecting merge conflicts? If not, it might be simpler to gets
>> ACKs from each maintainer, and then merge it though one tree.
>> 
> 
> There are some other DT changes for this cycle so those should probably
> go through MIPS.

No objection for this going through the MIPS tree, and from me:

Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>