[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180905135035.GT2977@mtr-leonro.mtl.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 16:50:35 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Arseny Maslennikov <ar@...msu.ru>
Cc: linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] IB/ipoib: Log sysfs 'dev_id' accesses from
userspace
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 07:13:16PM +0300, Arseny Maslennikov wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Arseny Maslennikov <ar@...msu.ru>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c
> index 30f840f874b3..7386e5bde3d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c
> @@ -2386,6 +2386,42 @@ int ipoib_add_pkey_attr(struct net_device *dev)
> return device_create_file(&dev->dev, &dev_attr_pkey);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * We erroneously exposed the iface's port number in the dev_id
> + * sysfs field long after dev_port was introduced for that purpose[1],
> + * and we need to stop everyone from relying on that.
> + * Let's overload the shower routine for the dev_id file here
> + * to gently bring the issue up.
> + *
> + * [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg272123.html
> + */
> +static ssize_t dev_id_show(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct net_device *ndev = to_net_dev(dev);
> + ssize_t ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (ndev->dev_id == ndev->dev_port) {
> + netdev_info_once(ndev,
> + "\"%s\" wants to know my dev_id. "
> + "Should it look at dev_port instead?\n",
> + current->comm);
> + netdev_info_once(ndev,
> + "See Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-net for more info.\n");
> + }
> +
> + ret = sprintf(buf, "%#x\n", ndev->dev_id);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(dev_id);
> +
I don't see this field among exposed by IPoIB, why should we expose it now?
> +int ipoib_intercept_dev_id_attr(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + device_remove_file(&dev->dev, &dev_attr_dev_id);
> + return device_create_file(&dev->dev, &dev_attr_dev_id);
Why isn't enough to rely on netdev code?
> +}
> +
> static struct net_device *ipoib_add_port(const char *format,
> struct ib_device *hca, u8 port)
> {
> @@ -2427,6 +2463,8 @@ static struct net_device *ipoib_add_port(const char *format,
> */
> ndev->priv_destructor = ipoib_intf_free;
>
> + if (ipoib_intercept_dev_id_attr(ndev))
> + goto sysfs_failed;
> if (ipoib_cm_add_mode_attr(ndev))
> goto sysfs_failed;
> if (ipoib_add_pkey_attr(ndev))
> --
> 2.19.0.rc1
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists