[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4a230727-1072-3bc9-1590-2e59c2162460@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 11:39:53 +0300
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
davem@...emloft.net, stephen@...workplumber.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
leon@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mark.rutland@....com,
fw@...len.de, dsahern@...il.com, lucien.xin@...il.com,
jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, christian.brauner@...ntu.com,
jbenc@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 03/13] net: sched: extend Qdisc with rcu
On 06.09.2018 11:30, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On 09/06/2018 12:58 AM, Vlad Buslov wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/include/net/sch_generic.h b/include/net/sch_generic.h
>> index 18e22a5a6550..239c73f29471 100644
>> --- a/include/net/sch_generic.h
>> +++ b/include/net/sch_generic.h
>> @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ struct Qdisc {
>> struct gnet_stats_queue __percpu *cpu_qstats;
>> int padded;
>> refcount_t refcnt;
>> + struct rcu_head rcu;
>>
>> /*
>> * For performance sake on SMP, we put highly modified fields at the end
>
> Probably better to move this at the end of struct Qdisc,
> not risking unexpected performance regressions in fast path.
Do you mean regressions on UP? On SMP it looks like this field
fits in the unused gap created by:
struct sk_buff_head gso_skb ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
Kirill
Powered by blists - more mailing lists