[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpXf=WgBGb2+2bNp-w=hssmbjPX6RMvjCKv2EW53yeBsVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 12:52:00 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, mark.rutland@....com,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
lucien xin <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 09/13] net: sched: extend tcf_block with rcu
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 12:59 AM Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com> wrote:
>
> Extend tcf_block with rcu to allow safe deallocation when it is accessed
> concurrently.
This sucks, please fold this patch into where you call rcu_read_lock()
on tcf block.
This patch _alone_ is apparently not complete. This is not how
we split patches.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists