[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <72fed78d-bc75-b88a-faa8-d2032be59d0f@hauke-m.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 23:33:29 +0200
From: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
john@...ozen.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, dev@...sin.me,
hauke.mehrtens@...el.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 3/6] dt-bindings: net: Add lantiq,xrx200-net
DT bindings
On 09/10/2018 02:53 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 10:16:44PM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>> This adds the binding for the PMAC core between the CPU and the GSWIP
>> switch found on the xrx200 / VR9 Lantiq / Intel SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>
>> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/net/lantiq,xrx200-net.txt | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/lantiq,xrx200-net.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/lantiq,xrx200-net.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/lantiq,xrx200-net.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..8a2fe5200cdc
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/lantiq,xrx200-net.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
>> +Lantiq xRX200 GSWIP PMAC Ethernet driver
>> +==================================
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +
>> +- compatible : "lantiq,xrx200-net" for the PMAC of the embedded
>> + : GSWIP in the xXR200
>> +- reg : memory range of the PMAC core inside of the GSWIP core
>> +- interrupts : TX and RX DMA interrupts. Use interrupt-names "tx" for
>> + : the TX interrupt and "rx" for the RX interrupt.
>> +
>> +Example:
>> +
>> +eth0: eth@...B308 {
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> + compatible = "lantiq,xrx200-net";
>> + reg = <0xE10B308 0x30>;
>
> Hi Hauke
>
> This binding itself looks fine. I just find this address range a bit
> odd. What are 0xe10b300-0xe10b307 used for? Are all 0x30 bytes used in
> the range? The address range ending at 0xe10b338 seems a bit
> odd. 0xe10b33f would be more typical.
>
> I'm asking because it can be messy when you find out you need to
> change the address range, and not break backwards compatibility.
>
> Andrew
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for the question, there were multiple problems with the
register size in this description.
It is a bit more complicated because the PMAC is part of the switch and
does not start at an even address.
It is correct that this starts at 0xE10B308, but the size is 0xCF8.
0xe10b300 is unused and 0xe10B304 is used to enable debug modes.
Hauke
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists