[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0j6VcFbO_R3fGLi2Ec1DmWsVA-0mzDG3LrA-3D5CrsPbw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 11:05:02 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Upstreaming Team <linux@...lessm.com>,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Wu <peter@...ensteyn.nl>, kherbst@...hat.com,
andy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
jonathan.derrick@...el.com, Thomas Martitz <kugel@...kbox.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, nic_swsd@...ltek.com,
rchang@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: Reprogram bridge prefetch registers on resume
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 8:45 AM Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com> wrote:
>
> On 38+ Intel-based Asus products, the nvidia GPU becomes unusable
> after S3 suspend/resume. The affected products include multiple
> generations of nvidia GPUs and Intel SoCs. After resume, nouveau logs
> many errors such as:
>
> fifo: fault 00 [READ] at 0000005555555000 engine 00 [GR] client 04 [HUB/FE] reason 4a [] on channel -1 [007fa91000 unknown]
> DRM: failed to idle channel 0 [DRM]
>
> Similarly, the nvidia proprietary driver also fails after resume
> (black screen, 100% CPU usage in Xorg process). We shipped a sample
> to Nvidia for diagnosis, and their response indicated that it's a
> problem with the parent PCI bridge (on the Intel SoC), not the GPU.
>
> Runtime suspend/resume works fine, only S3 suspend is affected.
>
> We found a workaround: on resume, rewrite the Intel PCI bridge
> 'Prefetchable Base Upper 32 Bits' register (PCI_PREF_BASE_UPPER32). In
> the cases that I checked, this register has value 0 and we just have to
> rewrite that value.
>
> Linux already saves and restores PCI config space during suspend/resume,
> but this register was being skipped because upon resume, it already
> has value 0 (the correct, pre-suspend value).
>
> Intel appear to have previously acknowledged this behaviour and the
> requirement to rewrite this register.
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116851#c23
>
> Based on that, rewrite the prefetch register values even when that
> appears unnecessary.
>
> We have confirmed this solution on all the affected models we have
> in-hands (X542UQ, UX533FD, X530UN, V272UN).
>
> Additionally, this solves an issue where r8169 MSI-X interrupts were
> broken after S3 suspend/resume on Asus X441UAR. This issue was recently
> worked around in commit 7bb05b85bc2d ("r8169: don't use MSI-X on
> RTL8106e"). It also fixes the same issue on RTL6186evl/8111evl on an
> Aimfor-tech laptop that we had not yet patched. I suspect it will also
> fix the issue that was worked around in commit 7c53a722459c ("r8169:
> don't use MSI-X on RTL8168g").
>
> Thomas Martitz reports that this change also solves an issue where
> the AMD Radeon Polaris 10 GPU on the HP Zbook 14u G5 is unresponsive
> after S3 suspend/resume.
>
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201069
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> Replaces patch:
> PCI: add prefetch quirk to work around Asus/Nvidia suspend issues
>
> Some of the more verbose info was moved to bugzilla:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201069
>
> This patch is aimed at v4.19 (and maybe v4.18-stable); we may follow
> up with more intrusive improvements for v4.20+.
>
> v2: reimplement the register restore within the existing
> pci_restore_config_space() code.
>
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 29ff9619b5fa..e1704100e72d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -1289,13 +1289,15 @@ int pci_save_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_save_state);
>
> static void pci_restore_config_dword(struct pci_dev *pdev, int offset,
> - u32 saved_val, int retry)
> + u32 saved_val, int retry, bool force)
> {
> u32 val;
>
> - pci_read_config_dword(pdev, offset, &val);
> - if (val == saved_val)
> - return;
> + if (!force) {
> + pci_read_config_dword(pdev, offset, &val);
> + if (val == saved_val)
> + return;
> + }
>
> for (;;) {
> pci_dbg(pdev, "restoring config space at offset %#x (was %#x, writing %#x)\n",
> @@ -1313,25 +1315,34 @@ static void pci_restore_config_dword(struct pci_dev *pdev, int offset,
> }
>
> static void pci_restore_config_space_range(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> - int start, int end, int retry)
> + int start, int end, int retry,
> + bool force)
> {
> int index;
>
> for (index = end; index >= start; index--)
> pci_restore_config_dword(pdev, 4 * index,
> pdev->saved_config_space[index],
> - retry);
> + retry, force);
> }
>
> static void pci_restore_config_space(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> if (pdev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_NORMAL) {
> - pci_restore_config_space_range(pdev, 10, 15, 0);
> + pci_restore_config_space_range(pdev, 10, 15, 0, false);
> /* Restore BARs before the command register. */
> - pci_restore_config_space_range(pdev, 4, 9, 10);
> - pci_restore_config_space_range(pdev, 0, 3, 0);
> + pci_restore_config_space_range(pdev, 4, 9, 10, false);
> + pci_restore_config_space_range(pdev, 0, 3, 0, false);
> + } else if (pdev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE) {
> + pci_restore_config_space_range(pdev, 12, 15, 0, false);
> + /* Force rewriting of prefetch registers to avoid
> + * S3 resume issues on Intel PCI bridges that occur when
> + * these registers are not explicitly written.
> + */
> + pci_restore_config_space_range(pdev, 9, 11, 0, true);
> + pci_restore_config_space_range(pdev, 0, 8, 0, false);
> } else {
> - pci_restore_config_space_range(pdev, 0, 15, 0);
> + pci_restore_config_space_range(pdev, 0, 15, 0, false);
> }
> }
>
> --
Passing the extra bool around is somewhat clumsy, but I haven't found
a cleaner way to do it, so
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists