[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180912.001002.2039573031999197896.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:10:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: xiyou.wangcong@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com,
santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com, rds-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Patch net v2] rds: fix two RCU related problems
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 18:27:26 -0700
> When a rds sock is bound, it is inserted into the bind_hash_table
> which is protected by RCU. But when releasing rds sock, after it
> is removed from this hash table, it is freed immediately without
> respecting RCU grace period. This could cause some use-after-free
> as reported by syzbot.
>
> Mark the rds sock with SOCK_RCU_FREE before inserting it into the
> bind_hash_table, so that it would be always freed after a RCU grace
> period.
>
> The other problem is in rds_find_bound(), the rds sock could be
> freed in between rhashtable_lookup_fast() and rds_sock_addref(),
> so we need to extend RCU read lock protection in rds_find_bound()
> to close this race condition.
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+8967084bcac563795dc6@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Reported-by: syzbot+93a5839deb355537440f@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Cc: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
> Cc: rds-devel@....oracle.com
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists