netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 04/20] zinc: ChaCha20 x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Sep 2018 13:33:24 +0200
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Samuel Neves <sneves@....uc.pt>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com>,
        Andy Polyakov <appro@...nssl.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 04/20] zinc: ChaCha20 x86_64 implementation

Hi Thomas,

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 8:13 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> Subset? Not really. Both MIT and BSD3-Clause are GPL2.0 compatible
> licenses. And if your intention is to have those files MIT/BSD only, yes
> then the single license identifier is the right thing. If you want it dual
> licensed then it should be expressed there clearly.

I always thought "GPL2 compatible" was the same as "subset" because of
the restrictions clause of GPL2. But IANAL, so for the avoidance of
doubt I'll take your advice and put both.

Jason