lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 08:13:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com> cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Samuel Neves <sneves@....uc.pt>, Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com>, Andy Polyakov <appro@...nssl.org>, mingo@...hat.com, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 04/20] zinc: ChaCha20 x86_64 implementation Jason, On Wed, 19 Sep 2018, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 12:30 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote: > > > > > +++ b/lib/zinc/chacha20/chacha20-x86_64-glue.h > > > @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT > > > > Please put that into a separate one liner comment. Also this should be > > 'GPL-2.0[+] or MIT' I think. > > I had that originally, but changed it to just MIT, since MIT is a > subset of GPL-2.0. And looking at tree repo, it appears this is what > others do too. Subset? Not really. Both MIT and BSD3-Clause are GPL2.0 compatible licenses. And if your intention is to have those files MIT/BSD only, yes then the single license identifier is the right thing. If you want it dual licensed then it should be expressed there clearly. Thanks, tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists