netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] netlink: remove NLA_NESTED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1537463187.3874.34.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Thu, 20 Sep 2018 19:06:27 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
        "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] netlink: remove NLA_NESTED_COMPAT

On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 16:56 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> 
> 
> > > @@ -172,7 +172,6 @@ enum {
> > >  	NLA_FLAG,
> > >  	NLA_MSECS,
> > >  	NLA_NESTED,
> > > -	NLA_NESTED_COMPAT,
> > >  	NLA_NUL_STRING,
> > >  	NLA_BINARY,
> > >  	NLA_S8,
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > Is it safe to remove an item from this emun ?
> 
> I believe it is, since it's not part of uapi. At least as long as you
> recompile all netlink policies afterwards.

That came out confusing. It isn't UAPI, so the renumbering doesn't
matter, at least as long as you don't try to load a module compiled with
one version of the enum into a kernel compiled with the other, or
something strange like that.

johannes